A word to the wise is sufficient. (Somebody said that...) As
Christians we are called by Jesus to be "wise as serpents and harmless
as doves". Part of that wisdom is having Spirit-directed discernment
between what is truth and what is less than truth.
With the
proliferation of social media, blogging, and the tainted media (who is
truly neutral anymore?) it is easy to accept the "spin" and believe the
opinion without even seeking out the truth.
I know. I've made this blunder, even though my source was legitimate and "reliable".
Make it a point to go to the
source of the "story". IOW, the person who said/did it.
Be careful out there, sheep. Wolves abound. And their goal is to fracture your faith.
Thursday, July 7, 2016
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Guest blog: It's Like Herding Cats
David Wilson is a pastor and a friend. He's been at this job for the same length of time as me. And I post this without his permission!
http://itslikeherdingcats.blogspot.com/2016/06/so-youre-pastor.html
http://itslikeherdingcats.blogspot.com/2016/06/so-youre-pastor.html
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Ending the Drought
It had not rained in Israel for three years. For a nation dependent on its agriculture and livestock for its survival, a three-year drought could be the end to life as they knew it. The cause for the lack of rain was well-known to everyone, including the king, a morally corrupt man named Ahab. Although most, including the king put the blame on a preacher named Elijah, God was behind it.
Three years
earlier this prophet Elijah boldly proclaimed that the rain – the lifeblood of
the nation - would cease until he said it would rain again. I don’t know of any meteorologist or scientist
that would be so brash. But Elijah was
because as a prophet he spoke for God. So,
you must be thinking the obvious: these people must have done something pretty
bad for God to turn off the rain.
And you would be
right.
When God gave
His Law for this nation in its infancy He forbade the worship of other gods or
the erection of idols representing those gods.
These people, the nation of Israel, belonged uniquely to God. Their history was one of God, often though
the miraculous, protecting the and preserving them against enemies seeking
their obliteration. He loved them. But
He also demanded their loyalty.
Unfortunately,
Israel’s leaders – many of its kings – led God’s people to abandon their
relationship with the Lord and turn to idol worship. It got so bad under Ahab and his queen, an
idolaters named Jezebel, that God took the extreme measure of drought to get
their attention and to turn their hearts back to Him.
As He had used
Elijah to produce His judgment, He would use him to prove to the people that
He, the Lord was truly God and the false god Baal was no god at all.
In a dramatic “competition”
between God and Baal involving altars and fire falling from heaven, utilizing
450 of Baal’s prophet calling out to Baal and Elijah praying to God, it was
proven irrefutably to the crowd that Baal was, indeed no God at all.
The apostle John
wrote to the first century believers these simple words: “Little children,
guard yourselves from idols” in 1John 5::21. The New Living Translation renders
his words, “Dear children, keep away from anything that might take God's place
in your hearts.”
An idol is
“anything that might take God's place in your hearts”. Could be other people. Could be ambition and career. Could be possessions. Could be lifestyle. Could be recreation. Anything.
It doesn't have to be a statue.
But no idol will do for you what Christ has done and will do.
I sometimes
wonder if the current track of our nation, one of abandoning the
Judeo-Christian principles upon which our nation was founded, is not largely
due to the church abandoning God. We say, “The Lord is our God”, while
embracing our own “Baals”.
If this
generation of Christians is being pulled away by idols, what will be left for
the next generation. If the Holy Spirit
right now spoke into your heart and revealed an idol in your life and said, “Choose. You have to reject one and embrace the
other. Which is God in your life?”
We may still
have time to choose and bring and end to the drought.
(Read the entire story in 1 Kings 17-18.)
Sunday, May 29, 2016
For Those Who Didn’t Come Home
It was a spring day fifty years ago. I was ten years old when our family –
mom, dad and four of us (of which I was the oldest) loaded up the Ford station
wagon and drove from our home in rural Onslow County, NC to Rocky Mount. Of the six who took the trip five would
make the drive back home.
Previous family trips never had us stop in Rocky Mount. We would always pass through on US Hwy
301. Interstate 95 wasn’t yet
built. But Rocky Mount was never a
destination for us, since our reason for heading that northerly direction was
to go farther north to the Washington, D.C. area to visit grandparents, aunts,
uncles and cousins. This trip was
different.
My memory doesn’t include some of the details. I can’t recall if we were talkative or
if we fought over our space in the back seat. Most likely we did.
And maybe that was a good distraction for my parents. Nor do I remember how long the trip
lasted, although I know we were back home in the afternoon. My guess is that I got to ride up front
beside mom on the return trip, but I don’t remember her words or emotions.
But it had to be emotional for her. We had taken Dad to the train depot in
Rocky Mount, where he boarded a train.
Somewhere, I guess, he boarded a plane. But he then spent a month in southern California training
for survival. When that month was
up he got on another plane and wound up in southeast Asia – South Viet Nam –
where he would spend the bulk, other than R(est) and R(elaxation) of the next
twelve months.
Dad is eighty years old now, but still very much a
Marine. He was just about to turn
thirty when he deployed. A father
of 4 with one on the way. Yet I
don’t remember ever any regrets being expressed in my hearing, either before
his time there or after. Not a
word.
During those 13 months in absentia Dad missed some big events at home. My first Little League season. He wasn’t there to play catch or coach
like he would in subsequent years.
My spiritual birth and then my baptism took place while he was gone. I
joined the Scouts and went on my first camping trips without him. He got word via the Red Cross that his
number 5 child was born that fall.
And I’m sure that there were other big happenings Dad missed
out on in that year. Honestly,
everything he missed out on was a big deal to him. And somehow my mother played the role of both parents those
13 months. Four of us were in
school. A baby at home. Yet, we never missed church. I never missed a game or a Scout
meeting. I just missed having my
dad at home.
Am I resentful of that? No way! I knew
from my earliest remembrances that my dad was a Marine (and I was and am proud of his service)
– that he had chosen this career that would take him from us not once, but
twice for a year at a time in my childhood. Mostly I have no regrets because at least my dad came home.
Monday is another Memorial Day, and with each one I
remember my dad’s service, not because Memorial Day celebrates him. It does not. I think of Dad because of the stories he has told me of his
Marine buddies who did not come home.
I see the tears well up in his eyes as he speaks of seeing “the bodies
of Marines stacked up like cord wood”.
Fifty years ago I learned in a very personal way that
freedom is not free. I went to
school with other Marine’s kids whose dads came home in flag-draped
caskets. It is for those Marines,
sailors, soldiers, airmen and coasties – the ones who made the sacrifice of
their own lives that others could be free – that we celebrated Monday.
It might be easy to complain about the weather on Monday “ruining” our holiday. But there would be no holiday had hundreds of thousands in our country’s history not laid down their lives so we could be free to celebrate.
I'm well aware that the little boy in the picture could have been me.
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
Using Jesus' Words (or not)
In the US politicians love to quote Jesus, especially when they take His words and apply them to their cause or agenda.
Often those quotes are taken out of context and make it sound as though Jesus would support some modern social and moral issues when the entirety of Scripture shows that He would not. The best known and misused words yanked out of context are probably "Judge not".
Then when some Christian speaks up and says, "Hey! That's not all that He said!", or "You got that all wrong", the Christian is chided for being "unchristian". Happens all the time.
And then His instructions to His disciples about His kingdom are frequently and wrongly applied to man-made governments like ours. That results in the government attempting to do the things Jesus gave to the church to do. Then, as society accepts the government acting as a charitable organization the church and other charitable organizations are seen as unnecessary. Taxes (compulsory) are raised to provide for these services, which takes away from the citizens' ability to contribute willingly to the church.
So, Jesus is convenient when His words can be used to support governmental social action. But what about His words that don't support the cause? Today I'm thinking of this parable, from Matthew 20 about a business man, his workers and equal wages.
“For the Kingdom of Heaven is like the landowner who went out early one morning to hire workers for his vineyard.He agreed to pay the normal daily wage and sent them out to work.
“At nine o’clock in the morning he was passing through the marketplace and saw some people standing around doing nothing.So he hired them, telling them he would pay them whatever was right at the end of the day. So they went to work in the vineyard. At noon and again at three o’clock he did the same thing.
“At five o’clock that afternoon he was in town again and saw some more people standing around. He asked them, ‘Why haven’t you been working today?’ They replied, ‘Because no one hired us.’
“The landowner told them, ‘Then go out and join the others in my vineyard.’
“That evening he told the foreman to call the workers in and pay them, beginning with the last workers first. When those hired at five o’clock were paid, each received a full day’s wage. When those hired first came to get their pay, they assumed they would receive more. But they, too, were paid a day’s wage. When they received their pay, they protested to the owner, ‘Those people worked only one hour, and yet you’ve paid them just as much as you paid us who worked all day in the scorching heat.’
“He answered one of them, ‘Friend, I haven’t been unfair! Didn’t you agree to work all day for the usual wage? Take your money and go. I wanted to pay this last worker the same as you. Is it against the law for me to do what I want with my money? Should you be jealous because I am kind to others?’
“So those who are last now will be first then, and those who are first will be last.”
I'm not hearing that parable quoted in the news by either the pundits or the agencies of government.
I wonder what's wrong with it? (I know the answer.) It is against the law for the owner of the business to do what he wants with his money. Apparently.
Often those quotes are taken out of context and make it sound as though Jesus would support some modern social and moral issues when the entirety of Scripture shows that He would not. The best known and misused words yanked out of context are probably "Judge not".
Then when some Christian speaks up and says, "Hey! That's not all that He said!", or "You got that all wrong", the Christian is chided for being "unchristian". Happens all the time.
And then His instructions to His disciples about His kingdom are frequently and wrongly applied to man-made governments like ours. That results in the government attempting to do the things Jesus gave to the church to do. Then, as society accepts the government acting as a charitable organization the church and other charitable organizations are seen as unnecessary. Taxes (compulsory) are raised to provide for these services, which takes away from the citizens' ability to contribute willingly to the church.
So, Jesus is convenient when His words can be used to support governmental social action. But what about His words that don't support the cause? Today I'm thinking of this parable, from Matthew 20 about a business man, his workers and equal wages.
“For the Kingdom of Heaven is like the landowner who went out early one morning to hire workers for his vineyard.He agreed to pay the normal daily wage and sent them out to work.
“At nine o’clock in the morning he was passing through the marketplace and saw some people standing around doing nothing.So he hired them, telling them he would pay them whatever was right at the end of the day. So they went to work in the vineyard. At noon and again at three o’clock he did the same thing.
“At five o’clock that afternoon he was in town again and saw some more people standing around. He asked them, ‘Why haven’t you been working today?’ They replied, ‘Because no one hired us.’
“The landowner told them, ‘Then go out and join the others in my vineyard.’
“That evening he told the foreman to call the workers in and pay them, beginning with the last workers first. When those hired at five o’clock were paid, each received a full day’s wage. When those hired first came to get their pay, they assumed they would receive more. But they, too, were paid a day’s wage. When they received their pay, they protested to the owner, ‘Those people worked only one hour, and yet you’ve paid them just as much as you paid us who worked all day in the scorching heat.’
“He answered one of them, ‘Friend, I haven’t been unfair! Didn’t you agree to work all day for the usual wage? Take your money and go. I wanted to pay this last worker the same as you. Is it against the law for me to do what I want with my money? Should you be jealous because I am kind to others?’
“So those who are last now will be first then, and those who are first will be last.”
I'm not hearing that parable quoted in the news by either the pundits or the agencies of government.
I wonder what's wrong with it? (I know the answer.) It is against the law for the owner of the business to do what he wants with his money. Apparently.
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Monday, May 2, 2016
When Faulty Reasoning Wins
An important but
difficult aspect of following Christ is being obedient to all He
commanded. One of the most common, well
known of those commandments is frequently referred to as “The Golden Rule”:
doing to others as we would have them do to us.
Certainly it is a simple rule to understand, but not so simple to
follow.
The founding of
the Southern Baptist Convention in 1845 was due to a disagreement strong enough
to divide Christian brothers. And the
issue that brought the decision was slavery.
Baptists in the north did not believe slave owners should be qualified
to serve overseas as missionaries. They
saw slavery as intrinsically evil and not a practice for Christians, especially
those who would represent Christ to other cultures. The churches in the north
said, “No!”
The churches in
the south disagreed, and as a result
separated from the northern Baptists, starting their own denomination that
would allow slave owners to become foreign missionaries. Why would Christians, including pastors
defend something like slavery? It’s not
the kind of beginning that should have ever happened in a body of Christian
people, but nonetheless it happened.
I’ve recognized
at least five poor reasons they, and others (even today) have used to justify choosing evil
over righteousness. All five led to such
wrong then and do as well today when we seek to make wrong somehow right.
First, the
dollar took precedence over godliness.
The economy of the south, with its large plantations had been built on
the blood, sweat and tears of slaves. It
was for the sake of maintaining economic stability that slavery was seen as
necessary. The thought was, “If we
condemn this practice our economy will suffer and likely collapse.” Slavery was seen as “just the way it is down
here.” Somehow they missed Jesus’ words
about the impossibility of serving God and money. Only one can be God.
A second, while
not likely a known phrase in 1845, was what we today know as “political
correctness”. Preachers bashing slavery
would have rocked a boat they were unwilling to rock. In many churches the greatest financial
supporters were no doubt wealthy plantation owners. Because slavery had been in practice at the
time for about 200 years there was no one who could remember a time when
slavery was unacceptable. So, very few
dared speak out against it because of its virtual universal acceptance below
the Mason-Dixon.
Because
“everybody’s doing it” why challenge it and seem out of step. That’s political correctness. And history has shown that being PC and at the same time being
morally correct is pretty much impossible. They’re oil and water.
Third was a
choice to redefine humanity. The thought
among the supporters of slavery was that whites were created to domineer over
blacks. It was a racist supremacy built
on a lie that a black man was somehow less than fully human. And, they reasoned, that is by the design of
the Creator. So, it must be the will of
God to own other men and women.
Misguided, indeed. But they
bought their own lie. They even preached
it from their pulpits.
A fourth error was to twist the
Scriptures so that they justified slavery.
After all, it’s true that you can find plenteous examples of slavery in
the Bible, right? (And you can find murder, torture, rape...) Yet they ignored the
clear historic fact that biblical Christianity has always ended slavery in
every culture in which the Gospel was free and adopted as the basis for
civilization.
I’ll continue this next week. And while it isn’t pretty, it is
contemporary. (And if you are wondering,
yes, I am a Southern Baptist. But, I came along a few years after 1845.)
Saturday, March 12, 2016
Freedom Has to Work Both Ways
Yesterday proved to be a "head scratching" day for me. First, Dr. Carson endorsed Mr. Trump. During the debates Trump had pounded Carson, as he did the others on the stage, with his crass attacks. Yet, a week after dropping out of the race Carson said they had "buried the hatchet", and Trump was his man for the job.
While I'm all for forgiveness it just seemed out of character for Gentle Ben to throw his support to a man who seems to be polar opposite. But that's the irritating beauty of America. Any citizen can choose his/her candidate. That's his/our right. While I might disagree with Carson, I do not have the right to silence him.
Later in the evening, in Chicago a Trump rally was cancelled because protesters inside the venue were so loud and threatening that Trump would not have been heard and the potential for violence was too high. Thus, in Chicago, the leading candidate of his party was silenced by those disagreeing with him.
Our Constitution's 1st Amendment reads like this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Like it or not, we all are guaranteed this "freedom of speech", even presidential candidates whose words or proposals we might find offensive or even immoral. Some might defend the protesters by invoking their freedom of speech. Don't they have the right to speak up and from the rooftops, if necessary shout their opposition. Of course, they do.
But the same amendment also guarantees the right of a candidate's supporters to peacably assemble. That right was denied them in Chicago by Trump's detractors. It was not their intention to hear Trump, but to stop him from speaking. And they succeeded. But in doing so they trampled on the bedrock of our civilization. And that makes their success an affront to all Americans, for it chips away at the liberties we all enjoy.
When the freedom of speech is attacked we should all be concerned. I, perhaps more than most appreciate what that freedom provides. My calling in life is to speak the Gospel of Christ. The first amendment protects my ability as an American to do so. It also prevents those who may not agree with the Gospel (and all it implies) from interrupting me or attempting to silence me or any other preacher. My church is guaranteed the right to assemble peacefully. It's the first amendment that provides that protection.
My concern is that if such attacks on the Constitution are allowed to continue in the political realm, it won't be long before they will be permitted in the religious as well. So, it's for that reason that while I may personally disagree with Carson's endorsement and Trump's rhetoric, I will stand for their right to express them. That freedom must work both ways or it ceases to be freedom.
For those who want to silence a candidate, the Constitution provides a way to do that. And it is equal across the board. The 15th amendment says, The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
So, if you don't like a candidate don't vote for him or her! Let your vote be your voice. It's still your freedom and right as a citizen.
While I'm all for forgiveness it just seemed out of character for Gentle Ben to throw his support to a man who seems to be polar opposite. But that's the irritating beauty of America. Any citizen can choose his/her candidate. That's his/our right. While I might disagree with Carson, I do not have the right to silence him.
Later in the evening, in Chicago a Trump rally was cancelled because protesters inside the venue were so loud and threatening that Trump would not have been heard and the potential for violence was too high. Thus, in Chicago, the leading candidate of his party was silenced by those disagreeing with him.
Our Constitution's 1st Amendment reads like this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Like it or not, we all are guaranteed this "freedom of speech", even presidential candidates whose words or proposals we might find offensive or even immoral. Some might defend the protesters by invoking their freedom of speech. Don't they have the right to speak up and from the rooftops, if necessary shout their opposition. Of course, they do.
But the same amendment also guarantees the right of a candidate's supporters to peacably assemble. That right was denied them in Chicago by Trump's detractors. It was not their intention to hear Trump, but to stop him from speaking. And they succeeded. But in doing so they trampled on the bedrock of our civilization. And that makes their success an affront to all Americans, for it chips away at the liberties we all enjoy.
When the freedom of speech is attacked we should all be concerned. I, perhaps more than most appreciate what that freedom provides. My calling in life is to speak the Gospel of Christ. The first amendment protects my ability as an American to do so. It also prevents those who may not agree with the Gospel (and all it implies) from interrupting me or attempting to silence me or any other preacher. My church is guaranteed the right to assemble peacefully. It's the first amendment that provides that protection.
My concern is that if such attacks on the Constitution are allowed to continue in the political realm, it won't be long before they will be permitted in the religious as well. So, it's for that reason that while I may personally disagree with Carson's endorsement and Trump's rhetoric, I will stand for their right to express them. That freedom must work both ways or it ceases to be freedom.
For those who want to silence a candidate, the Constitution provides a way to do that. And it is equal across the board. The 15th amendment says, The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
So, if you don't like a candidate don't vote for him or her! Let your vote be your voice. It's still your freedom and right as a citizen.
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Never Give Up!
Is there a
greater college basketball rivalry than Carolina/Duke? Probably not.
They played Wednesday night and like all their other games it was nip
and tuck and literally down to the last possession and final shot.
Carolina is
the better, more experienced and stronger team.
They were ranked #5, while Duke was way down at #20 nationally. And they played at the Dean Dome, Carolina’s
home court. It was no wonder then, that
Duke was always playing catch up. I
thought that when the UNC lead was at eight points late in the half that it was
their win.
But Duke
never quit.
They began to whittle at that lead in the waning minutes, and with just over 15 seconds remaining took a 1 point lead. Still, all the Tar Heels had to do was score one bucket to win. But the Duke defense was tenacious, and the last shot from Carolina was an air ball that landed in the hands of the Blue Devils. Game over.
They began to whittle at that lead in the waning minutes, and with just over 15 seconds remaining took a 1 point lead. Still, all the Tar Heels had to do was score one bucket to win. But the Duke defense was tenacious, and the last shot from Carolina was an air ball that landed in the hands of the Blue Devils. Game over.
Sunday, November 15, 2015
Bringing Paris (Too) Close to Home
--> The world can be overturned in 32 minutes.
Like you, I watched in utter disbelief Friday night, as the
news seemed to be “breaking” every other minute from Paris. Explosions at the soccer stadium filled
with fans. Shootings at a
café. And a concert hall filled
with young people held hostage, then executed one by one until the police
arrived.
Modern technology allows us to see such things in “real”
time. It’s both a blessing and a
curse. Yes, I want to know what is
happening as it happens. Not sure
why, though. But seeing actual
death lying in the streets as it happens…I find that disturbing.
In the days that have followed the spin masters have been
hard at work, seeking to make some sense out of the atrocity. Blame is cast in every imaginable
direction. Some claim it to be the
fault of Western politicians. In
other corners it is the fault of open borders and wholesale immigration. Or maybe it’s purely religious – whether
it is Christianity or Islam, although France is largely a humanist
society. Or its blame is to be put
on Israel. I’ve even read where
someone is saying it is a gun control problem!
But the reality is closer to home. Much closer.
Human wickedness is found everywhere. That’s not to say in any way that you
or I are guilty of what happened in Paris, or that what takes place regularly
in Syria, Iraq, Nigeria and other place on earth where barbarism regularly
seems to act in cruelty. But the
ability to live wickedly isn’t far from any of us.
The same innate sinfulness that possesses the terrorist and
drives him to slaughter dwells in every human heart. It just manifests itself differently. And of course a person’s worldview
comes into play. The majority of
us aren’t driven by our beliefs to destroy those with whom we disagree.
But what makes me different than the man who strapped on a
belt laden with explosives, fully intending to end others’ lives with his own
death?
One thing.
Grace.
The God who created us dispenses that grace that changes
hearts. He alone is the source of
that kind of grace. The Bible
tells us that it is “…by grace you are saved through faith, and this is not
from yourselves; it is God’s gift.”
“Saved”. To
some nothing more than an old-fashioned term from the vocabulary of a fire and
brimstone preacher. That’s
unfortunate. “Saved” from
what? From ourselves.
You see, it’s our nature that is damaged by our innate sin
(rebellion against God) that causes us – you…me…anyone to do wrong. Your “wrong” might be running a red
light while in a hurry to get to work.
Someone else's wrong might be extortion or embezzlement. For yet another it could be an act of
heinous violence that takes life.
God says He has available grace to make the changes
necessary in the life of anyone who will put their faith in His Son Jesus. Those changes are the result of being
“saved” by that grace. It’s not
anything I can drum up or produce by any religious efforts on my part. It’s all about God.
And it’s the only thing that separates me from those
deranged killers in Paris. God’s
grace. That’s it. That’s a humbling thought.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

